ChatGPT, a drafting aid for translation by emulation

On 17 October 2011, I published the first of two posts summarising my general approach to the type of translation/adaptation services I was then offering to my clients. The first was entitled Translation by emulation, take #1. The second, Translation by emulation, take #2, was posted on 12 November 2011.

In ChatGPT is a marvel of multilingualism, Johnson of The Economist writes "It is, in the jargon, a large language model. That means it is very good at predicting what kinds of words tend to follow which others ... (my bold)".

I conclude, though I have yet to conduct any tests, that one way to use ChatGPT before drafting a translation/adaptation by emulation, or using any similar approach, would be to ask ChatGPT a question, in the target language, on the subject addressed by the source text. It should often, I anticipate, come up with a text rich in key expressions and terminology already in use by others who have already published material on the said subject. 

Recall too that ChatGPT is perfectly capable of taking into account the education level, among other criteria, of your client's (hence your) target readership and the aim (information, gentle persuasion, etc.).

If you have access to ChatGPT and practise translation/adaptation by emulation, or any similar approach, and would like to report back, please comment.

Other relevant quotes from Johnson's piece:
"It is also able to instantly blurt out text in more than 50 languages—the precise number is apparently unknown to the system itself."
“I don’t translate from any other language; I look in my database for the best words and phrases to answer your questions.”
"This should not overshadow the achievement of a model that can effortlessly mimic so many languages, including those with limited training data. Speakers of smaller languages have worried for years about language technologies passing them by."

If by any chance you have yet to see for yourself ChatGPT's drafting skills, here's one place you could start.

A very persuasive mistranslation

This morning I participated in a discussion with other translators on how to turn a persuasive source text into an equally persuasive target document. The text under discussion was an interview given by Jean-Marc Jancovici, a French expert in energy and global warming, published in the September 2022 issue of L'Hémicycle.

A tenuous but potentially promising train of thought came to me a few hours later, triggered by an article (Translating the Bible is a vexed task, as a new book shows) that I had read recently in The Economist. The passage of interest is:

"In the Old Testament, Isaiah said an almah would give birth. Today most scholars agree that it probably just meant “young girl”. The translation of Isaiah’s Hebrew into pre-Christian Greek (in the Jewish text known as the Septuagint) rendered it as parthenos, or “virgin”. For Christians, this bolsters the idea that Jesus’s birth fulfilled a prophecy."

My train of thought will, I'm sure, sound provocative to many, but I see here a compelling example of an extraordinarily persuasive mistranslation that will, I trust, interest my colleagues who asked if I could provide any examples of persuasive writing and translation.

I recall learning from other articles and from a translation conference that included a paper by a member of the team working with Natân André Chouraqui (1917-2007) that one reason the Aramaic almah was rendered in pre-Christian Greek as parthenos (παρθένος), or virgin, was to align the translation with the target readership's strong preconceptions regarding the birth of deities and the like, and in this way make the text more persuasive. See, for instance, Translation for Transformation: André Chouraqui and His Unique Contribution to Interfaith Dialogue and Friendship.

Pause now to think for a moment about the impact of this decision on Christians, world history and goodness knows what else over the past two millennia. If ever there was a persuasive mistranslation, this is it.

See also: Young Mary vs Virgin Mary: A mistranslation of epic proportions.

French-English Glossary of Naval Technology v23 (#NavTechGloss v23)

 Update

This glossary is intended primarily for French-to-English translators specialising in naval defence technical journalism. It attempts to deal with terminological challenges specific to journalism, including access to and equivalents for the many synonyms, multiple designations and other devices that journalists use in both English and French -- though perhaps more in the latter than in the former -- to avoid repetitions.

The glossary began as a simple Word document over 25 years ago and has simply grown and grown. To accommodate its constant growth, I have adopted a custom page format (50 cm x 50 cm). The idea is not to print it but to use it on your computer. Better still, index it using an indexing search engine like dtSearch.

To download click here: NavTechGloss_Dyson_FR-EN_v23

Should the link fail due to a hacker or for any other reason, please let me know by submitting a comment.

Steve's terminology finds

Please find below a link to a personal collection of internet 'finds' that may be of interest to other FR => EN translators. Many of the entries come from: 

• tweets by Anglocom and others
• posts by translators on Pet peeves & bêtes noires des traducteurs FR<>EN and other FaceBook pages
• gleanings from news media that I consult regularly
• miscellaneous internet sources

Feedback and comments welcome.

If you have any queries, please contact me directly or leave a comment.

Link: Termino finds_FR-EN_SteveDyson_Nov2022

Should the link fail, whether due to a hacker or for any other reason, please let me know by submitting a comment.

Shifters' FR-EN glossary on decarbonizing the economy

Please find below a link to a working FR-EN glossary on decarbonization and related matters. This glossary was produced and is regularly updated by The Shifters (site in French) a French association providing support services, including translations by volunteers, for The Shift Project.

The glossary currently comprises 236 entries and uses US spelling. File format: Excel. Most entries correspond to queries raised by voluntary translators in the course of their work on translations for the Shift Project. No attempt has been made to systematically expand the glossary. I have reviewed most of the entries, sometimes reorganizing the content and adding information or links.
Please disregard comments addressed to individual members of the team.

The entry on sobriété will be of special interest to many.

Want to work as a volunteer translator? Check out The Shifters site. Experienced French-to-(mother-tongue) English translators welcome.

If you have any queries, please contact me directly or leave a comment.

To download click here: Shifters FR-EN gloss++_v8.xlsx

Should the link fail, whether due to a hacker or for any other reason, please let me know by submitting a comment.

Greek frigate programme

Translation/adaptation for Mer et Marine:

Short French version: Frégates grecques: la France présente son offre finale 

English: France presents final offer for next-generation Greek frigates

Translation reviewed by Julien Rosso at Maritime Translation.

Euphemism of the month

In One craft conquers air, sea and subsea domains, MaritimeJournal technical journalist Jake Frith writes:

VICTA is focused primarily on the defence market and one of her hallmarks is the inconspicuous insertion and extraction of ‘task-oriented force packages’ (ED: military euphemism of the month) at range.  Extending that range by including airborne delivery offers further flexibility and so enhances the potential of the craft.

The comment 'military euphemism of the month' highlights one technical journal's view of a technical term used by other technical journalists working in an allied domain. Portions of the maritime domain and industry are, of course, close to and even overlap with portions of the military domain and industries.

Like other journalists and writers, technical journalists read each other's work, monitor, and occasionally, as here, comment publicly on each other's terminology. Needless to say, translators of technical journalism should follow suit.

The 'euphemism of the month' may be intended as cheeky or possibly even cutting, but I think it is also fair to say that technical journalists in all domains are quick to pick up on all types of new terminology, including euphemisms, acronyms, and the like, not to mention constantly changing comparisons and metaphors that arise, then become fashionable before either disappearing or coming to be seen as clichés. Technical journalists track all this in their domains and in the language or languages in which they write professionally. Their translators need to constantly do the same in both their source and target languages; the latter even more closely than the former.